
I need to preface this review with saying that I am really quite devoted to Sloane Crosley. Sure, I didn’t love The Clasp, but that’s a small percentage of all the words she’s written, and all those other words are insightful, funny and make me think that if I knew her IRL, we’d get along famously. And then I found out she was writing a memoir. About grief. So basically, she was my NBF.
What can I say about Grief is for People without gushing…? There are two threads to Crosley’s story. The main one describes the period following the death of her closest friend, Russell, by suicide.
But the story begins with a different kind of loss – her apartment was burgled and her small, but meaningful collection of jewellery was stolen.
All burglaries are alike, but every burglary is uninsured in its own way.
And Russell is important here because he had a special relationship to ‘stuff’ and understood the significance of the things that were stolen. He was also there to help her deal with the aftermath of the burglary, which ultimately involved tracking down one very distinctive piece (ironically, a real life version of The Clasp) – Crosley’s sleuthing creates another engrossing thread in this memoir.
And then Russell isn’t there.
But there was never going to be a version of the story in which it wasn’t my missing jewelry and my dead friend. You can ignore grief. You push it around your plate. But you can’t give it away.
There are a couple of things that stood out for me. Crosley is honest about Russell and his sometimes abrasive or tricky behaviour, but her honesty is respectful and tender and aching. Interestingly, most of her descriptions of Russell are in the context of their relationship, protecting those involved –
He is my favourite person, the one who somehow sees me both as I want to be seen and as I actually am.
She also says things about grief in a way that I have not heard before and this is the very thing that draws me back to grief memoirs over and over.
And no one is obliged to learn something from loss. This is a horrible thing we do to the newly stricken, encouraging them to remember the good times while they’re still in the fetal position.
It’s impossible to predict how much you’ll miss something when it’s gone, to game grief in advance.
The minutes keep coming and I cannot swat them away.
Crosley discusses the particular pain of suicide – the confusion, the questions that will never be answered, the guilt (people either blame themselves for ‘not knowing’ or ‘knowing but not taking action’ – and yet, it is never as clear-cut as this).
When you die by suicide, you die alone. With few exceptions, you die alone. I don’t think people talk about this enough when they talk about suicide, if they talk about it at all. The ending of one’s life is the thing. Taking attendance seems like splitting hairs. But I cannot get over it.
But she also gives significant airtime to the burglary. I think Crosley copped a bit of criticism from some in putting these two losses in the one book. She explains –
…every time I try to separate these losses, to keep the first from contaminating the second, they come back together like magnets. Hideous sisters, they are keeping each other company in the dark.
And this makes perfect sense to me from a text-book bereavement point-of-view. One of the things that shapes how we grieve is our ‘loss history’ – essentially, we have to deal with previous losses (which doesn’t necessarily mean a death), before we can fully process the most current. In other words, people will often find themselves in a situation where someone has just died, and yet they are ‘upset’ by another death that happened years before. Our current losses reactivate our previous losses, and if we haven’t had the opportunity to mourn, it complicates things.
But there are no bereavement groups for stuff. They don’t exist. I’m sorry your house blew up but it was only a house. Grief is for people, not things.
And so, Crosley, weighed down by the disenfranchised grief she feels over the burglary, then catapults headfirst into grieving her dearest friend.
My initial grief, which I thought might be taking a manageable shape, has mutated. It’s colonized my entire personality.
Grief is for People is Crosley at her best – somehow there were parts where I smiled or laughed through my tears. She had me reading passages over and over. She had me laying down the book, so that I could pull myself together and re-calibrate. Her pain is laid bare on every page and it was a privilege to be allowed in.
…hating my heart, so showy in its persistence.
4.5/5
I’m wracking my brains to remember where I saw this, but I recently read that grief isn’t there to teach you a lesson. I
Oh, that’s good and so true. People say they’ve learnt something from grief but I do often think that they never asked to be taught something! If you remember where you heard it, please let me know.
That first quote struck home for me in a way you explore later in your review, having had my grandmother’s necklace stolen on holiday. I’m sorry Crossley was criticised for combining the two losses: it’s not the jewellery it’s its significance.
I think those who criticised Crosley really just exposed their own lack of understanding.
Sorry to hear you lost something significant, especially when you’re on holiday and supposed to be having fun.
I’ve never read Crosley at all but you have completely sold me on this and on her novels! What would be your favourite of hers?
I love her essay collection I Was Told There’d Be Cake, and I also really enjoyed her novel, Cult Classic (not the sort of thing I’d usually go for but it was very clever). I enjoy her sense of humour, but really, she’s just a great observer of people.
I know grief is for people not for things but losing a house to a fire or a bombing, that is something hard to process, don’t call it grief, but it’s more than just a material loss because a home is your shelter and has part of who you are and those who lived in it. I am not arguing, just contemplating the difficult issues discussed. It seems very interesting and important book.
Yes, it was interesting that because Crosley had these two losses happen within weeks of each other, that other people discounted, or downplayed the burglary when, in fact she did discover that grief wasn’t just felt over people, but felt for things as well. I have written on this blog before about the deep grieving I did (and continue to do – it doesn’t go away!) over a house that I associated with my grandparents, family and summer. At the time, it was incredibly hurtful when people said “It’s just a house.”
Very compelling topic! That’s cruel and hurtful, I resonate with that completely.
And ditto to the “teaching lesson” platitude.
So glad you enjoyed this as much as I did! It’s one of a kind — which is saying a lot for readers like you and me who ingest many a bereavement memoir.
This sounds so wise and compassionate. We were burgled decades ago and I had a small collection of jewellery taken. Worthless to others but priceless to me because it contained items that had been in my family for a long time and given by family members who had died. I still remember the police coming and saying, oh but you have lots of nice things in your house! Thus turning me from victim of a crime to spoiled brat in one neat phrase.
Pingback: Nonfiction November 2025 – My Year in Nonfiction | booksaremyfavouriteandbest