Firstly, if you haven’t seen Shirley Barrett’s film, Love Serenade, stop everything and see it. It is truly one of the best Australian films. Best. Ever.
If you appreciate the humour in Love Serenade, I’m quite certain you’ll love Barrett’s novel, Rush Oh!.
Rush Oh! tells the story of Mary Davidson, the eldest daughter of a prominent whaling family living in Eden on the rugged south coast of New South Wales. Mary narrates her family’s tumultuous experiences during 1908, a year that brings a tough whaling season (and ultimately the decline of the whaling industry in Eden), as well as drama off the seas.
“I imagine the prospect of having to go out in all weather and row back and forth across the bay in endless pursuit of enraged leviathans must have seemed exceedingly grim…”
I was thrown by the fact that a story about the gruesome, cruel practice of whaling can also be so charming and funny. Equally, I was not expecting to come across a heroine in Mary of the Jo March variety.
Rush Oh! is compelling on many levels. Although the story is told by Mary, it belongs to the whales and in particular the pod of ‘Killers’ that live in Twofold Bay. The Killers are in fact Orcas (who the Aboriginal crew members greet as reincarnated ancestors), and amazingly they herd Humpback and Sperm whales into the Bay where the whalers and their harpoons await. The cooperation between the whalers and the Killers is drawn straight from Eden’s whaling history, but Barrett gives new perspective on the true facts with sketches, newspaper clippings and glorious descriptions of the individual Killer ‘personalities’, in particular, the leader of the pod, Tom –
“There was no more welcome sound than the resounding smack! as Tom’s mighty tail crashed down upon the water. The men would cry, ‘Rush oh!’ and run to the whaleboats. Once the boats were put out, Tom (an impatient fish by nature) would lead them directly to the spot where his chums had corralled the whale.”
Tom is wilful but frolicsome, and Barrett makes much of his shenanigans (for example, the superb aside on why Canberra was chosen as the capital of Australia instead of Eden). Of the great baleens making their way past Twofold Bay, Mary says they’re no match for the Killers –
“It is necessary sometimes to remind oneself that these passing whales are undertaking an epic journey of many thousands of miles, for in fact they seem to dawdle and meander in the manner of recalcitrant schoolboys on their way to school; if there was a bottle, they would kick it. It is truly a wonder that they ever get anywhere.”
Left motherless, Mary is in charge of caring for her younger siblings and cooking for the whalers. Times are tough and supplies are limited, so Mary makes do with mutton, bandicoot and a gruesome piece of salted beef that she rids of larder beetles before serving. While domestic duties dominate her time, winning the affections of mysterious new crew member, John Beck, occupies her mind –
“I may not have yet mentioned that our visitor was remarkably handsome, and whalers as a rule were not celebrated for their good looks.”
Barrett creates an exceptional character in Mary – she is practical, yet not immune to dreaming; she is naive in matters of the heart but, as the story progresses, you realise that her understanding of the world and what is just, is far deeper than you first assume. But it is in Mary’s sharp wit and unapologetic insights that Barrett elevates this character from good to truly outstanding.
I loved the handful of scenes where Mary admits her (sometimes extremely petty) grudging of others –
“Her hair was a pale straw yellow colour, her features dainty and her figure slender, with an overall effect which many found pleasing. (I myself value qualities such as kindness and consideration for others above mere symmetry of form; however, it seems I am out of step with public taste in this regard.)”
Historical fiction truly succeeds if it has me searching the interwebs for more and I was astonished to discover that much of Rush Oh! is based on fact – Tom and the Killers existed, George ‘Fearless’ Davidson existed (although Mary is fictitious), and the landmarks that Barrett describes also exist. The use of newspaper clippings and Mary’s sketches give the story additional depth, as do particular historical touchstones such as the First World War and attitudes toward Indigenous Australians. But it’s the fine detail that sets Rush Oh! apart – we learn why a scarred whale should always be feared, the meaning of ‘boat-breakers’, how being neck-deep in rotting whale guts can ease rheumatism, why the black whale is the most valuable of all, and how to make a stubborn horse walk.
Barrett does not shy away from the brutality of whale hunting but the details are tempered by Mary’s re-telling. Of her drawing below, Mary says –
“You can see from the position of the whale’s enormous flukes that its tail will crash down upon the boat at any moment. It is spouting blood; also, there is a fountain of blood issuing from the point where the lance enters the whale’s vitals, spraying over the men and giving them a most ghoulish appearance. One of the striking features of the painting is the look of abject terror on the faces of the crew, with the exception of my father, who is known locally by the sobriquet of ‘Fearless’.”
It is through Mary and the fact that she is painfully aware that her family’s survival depends on the killing of whales, that Barrett delivers an appropriately pitched moral message.
“For although I understood in principle the technicalities of whaling – the harpooning, the chase to exhaustion, the necessity of swift and vigorous lancing – I had never conceived, never understood, never imagined for one moment the horror of it all.”
This book is not without faults but its charm outweighs any quibbles. I was completely immersed in the township of Eden in 1908 – its rallying for a big whale; the drama of the chase; the speculation and expectations that accompany first love – and Rush Oh! is one of the most memorable and unique books I’ve read.
5/5 Everything you don’t expect from historical fiction.
Pingback: Book Prizes. I love them. | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
I like whaling books. Have mostly read fiction about the wives at home in Nantuckett waiting. I would enjoy reading more about the whales. I like the book illustration too.
If you enjoy whaling stories then this one’s a must ( although I can’t say how it compares to other whaling stories because I can’t recall having read any others… No, not even Moby Dick!).
Loved this too–the wit and vim of Mary’s voice really did it for me!
Kate…I’m probably one of the few people who’ve read “Moby Dick” more than once…so “Rush Oh!” sounds appealing to me.
When I saw the name, Shirley Barrett, I wondered if she was related to Andrea Barrett, the National Book Award winning author of “Ship Fever”…but, alas, no relation. Interestingly, Andrea, like Shirley (I love the name Shirley, perhaps because I loved Shirley Temple…but, I digress) also took facts from natural history, and spun them into appealing yarns that gave vibrant life to stale subject matter.
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p…
I think you are most certainly one of the very few people who’ve read Moby Dick more than once! Have you read The Art of Fielding by Chad Harbach? Some wonderful Moby Dick references in that story (and an ace book to boot).
I loved this one (I reviewed it yesterday too)! I love all the illustrations you included in your review.
After I’d posted my review I popped over to Goodreads to see what others thought and was surprised by the poor ratings. Seems quite a few gave it a low score because of the whaling element… 1) If you don’t want to read about whaling, then don’t read a novel that is about a whaling family. 2) I don’t ‘like’ or support whaling in any way but that’s different to reading an historical account – i had a new understanding of the danger of the whale chase and had never really considered how they caught a whale to shore… Anyway, the low scores because they ‘don’t like whaling’ seem incredibly unfair to me and do a disservice to this extremely well-written and thoroughly researched book.
Could not agree more–I love whales (I have a tattoo of one), and this book did not glorify whaling at all.
No, it didn’t glorify whaling at all and I think that was why it was so well done – you understood the terror of the chase but it was very much tied to the survival of the family and the town ie. The need for one whale a year.
Because I am an obedient person, I sat and watched Love Serenade from your link last night. Funny how I was able to pick yesterday that Miranda Otto was in it, because I have no memory of EVER seeing it before. It is SUCH a terrific film, I found it so delightful, I was captivated, and I will be sharing it far and wide, forcing people to watch it with me. Also, you might be interested to know, I just saw something about Hope Farm which means I am going to read it, as it falls under my ‘reading for research’ exemption. Stay tuned for my response. Have a great Easter and hols too, btw.
Hooray! Hooray! Hooray! I’m glad you enjoyed Love Serenade (I always worry that when I talk something up I end up doing it a disservice because it doesn’t meet expectations).
I obviously will be BUSTING to hear your thoughts on Hope Farm (but truly hope our discussions don’t bias your reading).
It was seriously a WONDERFUL movie and I will be, as I said, pressing it on all, far and wide. As for HF, I read the first three pages or so just to look at. To me the tone is different entirely to the first one, but I will compare and report back when the time comes to read properly, which will be soon I think now. Will finish Blood Meridian first. Happy holidays!
Pingback: Bookish (and not so bookish) Thoughts | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Definitely not a book I would ever think of picking up but the premise indeed sounds interesting! Glad you enjoyed this book, I’ll have to keep a lookout for it 🙂
I think you’d love it Lianne – the historical elements are fascinating and it has been meticulously researched.
Sounds wonderful! Its now on the TBR 🙂
I love adding to your TBR list 😉
You do it a lot 🙂
I am reading it right now and I’m enjoying it, I actually like the whaling aspect (despite not “liking” whaling). I too was surprised at how harsh goodreads was.
I didn’t think it glorified whaling at all (And I obviously don’t ‘like’ whaling either). Thought Mary was such a unique and memorable voice and that it was a fresh take on historical fiction.
Pingback: Superlatives: Exploring Genres
Pingback: If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a hundred times – read these books | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: Sample Saturday – whaling, a lost child, and boarding school | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: Show-off Holiday Post: Mungo National Park | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: 2016 Kibble and Dobbie Longlists | ANZ LitLovers LitBlog
Pingback: 2016 Kibble and Dobbie shortlists | ANZ LitLovers LitBlog
Pingback: Just quietly, this is a great bunch of books | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: Top Books for Book Groups that Like Wine and Whining | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: Six Degrees of Separation – from Revolutionary Road to Rush Oh! | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: Reading Challenges 2016 | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: My Best Books for 2016 | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: March Rewind | booksaremyfavouriteandbest
Pingback: Thar she blows!: Its got to be Rush Oh! | Words and Leaves